New York Times bestselling author Joyce Carol Oates returns with an incendiary novel that illuminates the tragic impact of sexual violence, racism, brutality, and power on innocent lives and probes the persistence of stereotypes, the nature of revenge, the complexities of truth, and our insatiable hunger for sensationalism.

The Sacrifice
Author: Joyce Carol Oates
Publisher: Ecco
Year: 2015
Pages: 309

When a fourteen-year-old girl is the alleged victim of a terrible act of racial violence, the incident shocks and galvanizes her community, exacerbating the racial tension that has been simmering in this New Jersey town for decades. In this magisterial work of fiction, Joyce Carol Oates explores the uneasy fault lines in a racially troubled society. In such a tense, charged atmosphere, Oates reveals that there must always be a sacrifice—of innocence, truth, trust, and, ultimately, of lives. Unfolding in a succession of multiracial voices, in a community transfixed by this alleged crime and the spectacle unfolding around it, this profound novel exposes what—and who—the “sacrifice” actually is, and what consequences these kinds of events hold for us all.

Working at the height of her powers, Oates offers a sympathetic portrait of the young girl and her mother, and challenges our expectations and beliefs about our society, our biases, and ourselves. As the chorus of its voices—from the police to the media to the victim and her family—reaches a crescendo, The Sacrifice offers a shocking new understanding of power and oppression, innocence and guilt, truth and sensationalism, justice and retribution.

A chilling exploration of complex social, political, and moral themes—the enduring trauma of the past, modern racial and class tensions, the power of secrets, and the primal decisions we all make to protect those we love—The Sacrifice is a major work of fiction from one of our most revered literary masters.


Book Covers


Afterword

Though it is set decades later, The Sacrifice is strongly linked to my novel them (1969). The Detroit “riot” of July 1967—(more accurately called, by individuals who’d lived through it, the Twelfth Street Riot)—as well as the Newark “riot” of July 1967—resulted in a number of carefully researched studies into “black urban civil disorder” in subsequent years, but these were not available to me at the time of the composition of them.

Among the many books, articles, and online materials consulted for The Sacrifice are three which have been of particular interest:


Tweet

Twitter: The Sacrifice


Reviews

“In her latest novel, The Sacrifice, Joyce Carol Oates explores in fiction what most of us only experienced through headlines some twenty-five years ago. Striving to inhabit the ‘procession of voices’ on every side of an explosive racial crime, or hoax, perhaps, she reminds us of what is too easily lost in our world of instant and quickly forgotten news—that there is a story behind, and in between, every word of a press release, that pauses in a court transcript are novels waiting to be written, and that pain, fear, and ambition bind us together in common humanity even as they pull us apart. Most of all, reading The Sacrifice evoked for me what the great W.E.B. Du Bois wrote of the color line over a century ago: ‘Herein lies the tragedy of the age . . . that men know so little of men.’ The same might be said of fifteen-year-old girls trapped in our nation’s inner cities. Joyce Carol Oates, with characteristic brilliance, has masterfully drawn Sybilla Frye so that we may, in turn, draw closer to those who remain nameless and voiceless, beyond the next news cycle of racial hatred and discord.”

—Henry Louis Gates, Jr.
Alphonse Fletcher University Professor and Director of the Hutchins Center for African and African American Research at Harvard University

Rose Tremain, The Guardian, January 12, 2015
5 stars
“This outline, and the novel’s resolution … beautifully captures the sorrow afflicting so many divided communities in the US and the wider world. It is an entrenched kind of sorrow, with both sides so trapped in prejudice and fear that nothing alters as the years pass. … But we also see how, in the hands of a great writer, a gripping story can be torn from the poisonous rubble. Perhaps, at least, there is hope in an act of artistic empathy as powerful as this.”

Donna Seaman, Booklist, December 15, 2014
5 stars
Readers may find this boldly incendiary and propulsive novel vexing, even offensive. And Oates fully intends to make readers squirm. We do urgently need to face our unexamined assumptions and prejudices. But for all its headline brashness, visceral magnification, and societal melodrama, The Sacrifice is laced with striking psychological subtleties, painful ironies, and flashes of tenderness and wit.

Karen Brady, The Buffalo News, February 15, 2015
4 stars
Stygian and hopeless places are her forte, and she usually probes the darkness even deeper. In fact, for Oates, “The Sacrifice” is an almost tame book, with very few segues into the further recesses of her imagination. But it is also a strong book, speaking through fiction to a reality, be it the late 1980s or 2015, wherein nobody wins.

Lorraine Courtney, Irish Independent, February 15, 2015
4 stars
Some readers might have issues with Oates’s jarring portrayal of black, working-class life. Still, in this highly provocative book, she wades into territory that very few white writers would ever dare to tread and has given us a very honest and raw blend of sizzling drama and the brutal truths of race in our world today. Given recent racial tensions in the US, it is a courageous reminder that some situations are far from being as black and white as they may first seem. Oates, as always, writes with the ease of a master of language, uncoiling the bitterest of stories with barely a word wasted.

Eric K. Anderson, Bearing Witness: Joyce Carol Oates Studies, 2015
4 stars
Near the beginning of the novel it’s cryptically written that “racism is an evil except when it benefits us.” This italicised “us” is the collective group in diametric opposition to “them.” It’s the creation of an artificial division out of self-interest whereby one person’s life is believed to matter more than another’s. By presenting a searing portrait of racial politics in contemporary America The Sacrifice shows how everyone has the capacity to do this.

Leslie McDowell, The Independent,  January 24, 2015
4 stars
This novel simmers with barely concealed rage at the impotence inflicted on people by race and gender inequalities: the rage of the characters themselves, and the rage of the authorial presence that points us to events ahead…

Robert Rorke, New York Post, January 18, 2015 
4 stars
A portrait of family damaged by poverty and violence as well as those who would happily exploit them, “The Sacrifice” ranks among Joyce Carol Oates’s best novels.

Alan Cheuse, NPR, December 26, 2014
4 stars
“She sympathetically embraces her characters, black and white, except perhaps for the deceitful huckster Mudrick, a figure rather Dickensian in his lust for acclaim and power. Will some readers want to quarrel with Oates’s jarring depiction of black, working-class life? Probably. In this provocative novel, she barges her way into territory where not many white writers have dared to tread – and produced a raw and earnest mix of fiery drama and the bone-cold truths of race as we live it today.”

Alastair Mabbott, The Herald, February 14, 2015
3 stars

Judith Musser, Philadelphia Inquirer, February 8, 2015
3 stars

Jon Michaud, Washington Post, January 29, 2015
3 stars

Donna Bailey Nurse, Boston Globe, January 24, 2015
3 stars

Roxane Gay, New York Times, January 30, 2015
2 stars

 Publishers Weekly, November 24, 2014
2 stars

Kirkus Reviews, November 15, 2014
2 stars


Image: “University Student” by Angela Sevin; “Misty Bokeh” by Theen Moy


2 Comments »

  1. Greeting Joyce Carol Oats:

    Artistic creativity, Joyce Carol Oats, involving the juxtaposition of a big case should not

    bury deeper into the earth critical elements of an unsolved murder.

    1) Robert Abrams, the special prosecutor appointed by Governor Mario Cuomo, suppressed the official pathologist report by Dr Alexander Aplascia where it was stated that Harry Crist Jr was murdered (there was no suicide). Robert Abrams presented to the grand jury a pathologist that did not examine the body.

    2) A Juror testified under oath that Robert Abrams wrote the Grand Jury Report and that the Grand Jury did not write the Grand Jury Report.

    3) A Dutchess County NY Petit Jury found that Steven Pagones was involved in the rape and kidnap of Tawana Brawley and Steven Pagones lost on this point against Attorney Alton Maddox who can repeat in public that “Steven Pagones was involved in the rape and kidnap of Tawana Brawley” without being prosecuted for defamation because Alton Maddox won the defamation case against Steven Pagones that Steven Pagones initiated.

    4) Because there is no statue of limitations for murder (Harry Crist Jr was murder according to the official Pathologist report) this case is not over.

    5) Because Steven Pagones admitted under oath that Scott Patterson, Harry Crist Jr, Eugene Branson and himself (Pagones) were in route to Dutchess Fair Mall on Saturday Morning 11/28/1987 when Harry Crist Jr mentioned “a girl in a bag of shit”, they were all implicated because at this time the story had not made it to the media and only the culprits would know. Someone later killed Harry Crist Jr.

    6) The case is still hot and unresolved just to protect a well connected former Dutchess
    County Assistant DA & the names of the former Dutchess County Judges in his family!!

    Like

  2. Greetings Readers:

    Thank you for not attacking and being interested in verification.

    The index # is 4595/88 (Sup. Ct., Dutchess Co. 1988) for the case of Steven Pagones v Alton Maddox, C. Vernon Mason, Al Sharpton and Tawana Brawley.

    One critical element in the case record is the “verdict sheet” where Steven Pagones was NOT awarded damages from Alton Maddox for saying that “Steven Pagones was involved in the kidnap and rape of Tawana Brawley”. The court made Alton Maddox pay for saying that Harry Crist Jr was murdered even though Pathologist Alexander Aplasca testified at the defamation hearing that he confirms his original investigation indicating that the death of Harry Crist Jr was not a suicide. Attorney Alton Maddox had argued that the original Grand Jury investigation was defective because (among other reasons!!) Robert Abrams did not subpoena the Pathologist (Dr Alexander Aplasca) that examined the body of Harry Crist Jr. Robert Abrams file a false document by penning that it was a suicide (Hoax?). Roberts Abrams also reported in speech to the media that the death of Harry Crist Jr was a suicide, contrary to what the Pathologist
    documented. To protect Robert Abrams, Judge Hickman instructed the jury that “Truth is no defense” in a defamation case. (Please get the transcript including the verdict sheet!!)

    When Robert Abrams realized that Attorney Alton Maddox had the right to depose Pagones first, Robert Abrams filed a complaint with the Brooklyn Disciplinary Committee in an attempt to save Pagones and derail Maddox.

    An article in the New York Times on October 7, 1988 states as follows:

    [Robert H. Strauss, the chief counsel to the disciplinary panel in Brooklyn, said it was ‘very rare’ to receive complaints citing violations such as those contained in Mr. Abrams’ letter, many of which turns on what the lawyers actually instructed their clients to do. Normally, conversations between lawyers and their clients are confidential and require a waiver by the client before they can be divulged. This could pose difficulties for anyone trying any ethical breaches.]

    In an attempt to save Pagones and derail Maddox, Attorney General Robert Abrams demanded that the Brooklyn Disciplinary Committee make Maddox reveal privileged (protected) information about the 67 count indictment against Al Sharpton and privileged (protected) information about Tawana Brawley. Robert Strauss said, in general, that the privilege belongs to the client and requires a waiver from the client. Abrams wanted Maddox to violate the attorney client privilege in multiple cases. Maddox refused to violate the attorney client privilege and was suspended for this reason because of the influence of Robert Abrams. Attorney Alton Maddox’s career and life were ruined to protect Steven Pagones. If anyone did their homework, Robert Abrams should have been prosecuted if New York were really interested in standards!!

    The Pagones’ defamation case against Tawana Brawley was defective because Tawana was a minor at the time and required a “guardian ad litem” which was never secured!! All action against Tawana was defective and Tawana never had her day in court yet!!! Please check the record.

    Attorney Alton Maddox tried to remedy all of the confusion in the following civil rights case:

    Maddox v. Prudenti et. al. Index No. 5444 (U.S.D.C., E.D.N.Y. 2004).

    Alton Maddox stated the following:

    [The office of New York State Attorney General filed legal papers falsely claiming that I had been “disbarred” from the practice of law when it knew that I had only been suspended from the practice of law. This representation confirmed the mistreatment that I had been accorded before the Brooklyn Disciplinary Committee.]

    People who are saying “Hoax” never knew the details.

    Thank you all for reading this,

    Walter From Passaic/NJ

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s